Click here to download the
original document to your word processor.
To return to the previous page, click here.
PROPOSAL FOR
A THERAPEUTIC DAY SERVICE.
A locally based, small-group oriented, 5-day, daytime therapeutic community.
CONTENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 BACKGROUND
3 PROPOSAL
4 BENEFITS
5 IMPLEMENTATION
6 APPENDICES
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Overview
1.2 Options
1.3 Recommendations
2.1 Gap in service provision
recurrent deliberate self harm
various, often fluctuating, symptoms of clinical depression and anxiety
eating disturbances
interpersonal problems, which may include violence
substance abuse
behavioural difficulties, including criminal offences.
somatic symptoms without physical pathology
2.2 Service Benefits
A pattern of short-term and crisis-driven service responses is ineffective, costly and, for many patients, counterproductive. The personal, social and health service costs for patients are high in terms of "ineffective work patterns, chaotic family and interpersonal functioning, the social inheritance of mental disorder, the social and personal costs of substance abuse, and the inappropriate utilisation of health care services" according to Roth & Fonagy's Department of Health sponsored review ('What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research', Guilford 1996). They suggest that more intensive longer-term treatment responses be used.
3.1 Proposed service overview
The core service need can be met by the provision of an intensive Psychotherapeutic Day Unit. This service would provide a range of group oriented psychological therapies aimed at enabling patients to cope more adaptively with their intense emotional states and problematic interpersonal relationships, helping them develop the capacity for self-management. The overall programme will be managed within a therapeutic community framework, which provides containment of the patients' distress and promotes their acceptance of personal responsibility. This model is the most widely accepted and practised approach with this group of patients and is based on that of the Henderson Hospital, which has been commissioned as the national provider for the small proportion of these patients who can only be treated within a residential environment.
The non-residential model has several advantages over the residential model. Patients are able to maintain existing relationships within their home area, which are likely to be important in the period following treatment. Housing provision can also be maintained. At the same time dependency is discouraged, and there is an opportunity to practice newfound social skills and confidence in a non-protected environment over the weekends and evenings. Finally, the non-residential model is substantially less expensive than providing overnight care.
3.3 Procedures
Based on ideas of collective responsibility, citizenship and empowerment, therapeutic communities are deliberately structured in a way that aims to encourage responsibility and avoid unhelpful dependency on professionals. Patients are seen as bringing strengths and creative energy into the therapeutic setting, and the peer group is seen as all-important in establishing a strong therapeutic alliance. The work with each patient will be designed to be at multiple levels of psychological functioning: individual personality structure, social relationships, basic skills of living and working, and family relationships. Patients will work in a range of groups, some exploratory/analytic, some cognitive/behavioural and psychoeducational/problem focussed. Family services, psychiatric medication consultation, outreach and follow-up will provide additional support. Length of stay will be from 12-18 months. Aftercare/follow-up will include liaison with employment and housing bodies.
Informal mutual support networks outside operational times (overnight and at weekends) have been found to be effective in containing patients until the community reconvenes, involving minimal use of out of hours services. Use of psychiatric inpatient facilities, emergency and out of hours psychiatric services, and Accident and Emergency all typically reduce as a function of how far the individual has progressed through the service. Although patients would usually retain their RMO, involvement with them would be expected to be minimal once the patient was engaged in the programme.
3.5 Referral Routes
Referrals would be accepted from general practitioners, psychiatrists and other members of community mental health teams, mental health professionals in specialist services (such as Psychological Therapies Service and Clinical Psychology), social workers, and doctors in specialties other than psychiatry.
3.6 An Evidence-Based Approach
There is convincing evidence that a psychotherapeutic day service can meet the needs of this patient group, and that gains from medium term intensive treatment are retained as measured by subsequent reduced service usage and psychological distress. This has been recognised by the NHS National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group, which noted that 'There is now good evidence in the effectiveness of the therapeutic community model' in the treatment of patients with personality disorders (not just Borderline PD). This appraisal has led to NSCAG designation for two new residential therapeutic communities, as it is now regarded as a 'proven effective service' (Annual Report 1998-1999). The related 'partial hospitalisation' day service model has provided the most convincing evidence of efficacy of any treatment modality for patients with personality disorder.
See Appendix I 'A Summary of the Evidence' for further information.
4.1 To the Trust
The Trust business plan for the year 2000/2001 prioritises measures to reduce psychiatric readmission rates and continued reduction on inappropriate OATS. Implementation of this proposal would contribute to both these aims.
· Stabilised patterns of work and family functioning
· Independence of service support
· Reduced risk of suicide, self-harm and substance abuse
· Developmental and support needs appropriately addressed through highly valued talking treatments.
4.4 Implementing the National Service Framework
The unit would make substantial contributions in the following areas targeted by the National Service Framework (NSF).
5 IMPLEMENTATION
5.1 Establishing effectiveness
A thorough evaluation of the proposed unit is considered essential. Research findings and clinical expertise will be widely disseminated throughout Health and Social Services across the Trust.
5.2 Structure
A typical weekly itinerary might look as follows.
|
Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
|
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
|
Exploratory small group |
Specialist Group |
Large Group |
Exploratory small group |
Specialist Group |
|
Lunch |
Lunch |
Lunch |
Lunch |
Lunch |
|
Specialist Group |
Specialist Group |
Community meeting |
Specialist Group |
Specialist Group |
|
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
Staff training and business |
Community meeting |
Community meeting |
Specialist groups might include social skills training, specialist therapies (such as Dialectical Behaviour therapy), practically oriented groups (housing and welfare, occupational therapy), patient business meetings, practical task groups. The service would run on group lines, but individual interventions such as family therapy would be used where appropriate.
An outreach function would be an integral part of the proposed service.
5.3 Facilities required
Sufficient to accommodate 18-24 patients, including a single large room and accommodation for 3-4 small groups.
5.4 Personnel
Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy
Clinical staff and group convenors with a range of backgrounds and skills for community groups, analytic, cognitive/behavioural and other small groups, large group.
Therapeutic experience in analytic, cognitive behavioural (dialectical behavioural), large groups.
Administrative staff: medical secretary/receptionist
(Proximity to Psychology, Psychological Therapies Service and Community Mental Health Teams would enable cross working and part-sessional work.)
5.5 Cost summary
Consultant: £64,000
Clinical staff (including group convenors): 34 sessions @ £3,000 per session=£102,000
Administrative staff: medical secretary/receptionist 2xWTE's @£12,000=£24,000
Total staff costs: £190,000
Non-staff costs: approximately £20,000 (based on a similar unit in Reading); dependent on availability of existing building /lease, running costs related.
See 'Appendix II: Cost-benefit analysis' for further details of costs over time.
See 'Appendix III: SWOT analysis' for summary Strengths, Weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis of the project.